A healthcare research initiative was conducted to better understand attitudes and behaviors related to orthopedic procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers compared with hospital settings. This ASC orthopedic surgery research study the US market was designed to generate practical ambulatory surgery center insights into how orthopedic care is delivered across different procedural environments.

The study focused on biosurgery and wound closure needs within the US market, with particular emphasis on orthopedic surgeons and physician assistants who actively operate or assist in Medicare-certified ASCs. As a biosurgery needs in ambulatory surgery centers in the US insights initiative, the research supported broader biosurgery market insights, wound closure research, and medical device research in orthopedic surgical care.

The research engaged total joint surgeons, spine surgeons, and physician assistants to capture a practical view of how surgical teams approach procedures, product usage, and care delivery across ASC environments. This provided a strong foundation for orthopedic surgeon research, physician assistant research, and surgical behavior insights across key orthopedic procedure types.

Business Challenge

As more orthopedic procedures continue shifting into ambulatory surgery centers, healthcare organizations need a clearer understanding of how surgeon and assistant behaviors differ between ASC and hospital settings. The study addressed this need through orthopedic surgeon behavior ASC vs hospital research and ASC vs hospital orthopedic care comparison research, helping clarify how care-setting differences influence workflow, product use, and clinical decision-making.

The organization required insight from clinicians who were not only familiar with ASC environments, but who also actively participated in relevant orthopedic procedures on a regular basis. This made respondent qualification especially important, as the study needed experienced professionals with current, hands-on involvement in total joint and spine procedures. This focus supported clinical decision making in ASC orthopedic procedures, surgeon decision insights, and real-world orthopedic procedure insights from active ASC clinicians.

The research also required a balanced sample across multiple clinical roles and procedure types, including orthopedic total joint surgeons, spine surgeons, and physician assistants, while maintaining minimum representation across knee, hip, and shoulder-related surgical experience. This made the work a useful orthopedic procedure in ambulatory surgery centers study and a focused source of orthopedic market analysis for the US healthcare landscape.

Our Approach

We supported a 20-minute quantitative survey among 250 US-based healthcare professionals involved in orthopedic procedures performed in Medicare-certified ambulatory surgery centers. This Medicare certified ASC orthopedic research insights approach helped ensure that the respondent base reflected current, qualified ASC experience in the US market.

The respondent audience included 100 total joint surgeons, 100 spine surgeons, and 50 physician assistants. Within the total joint surgeon group, quotas were structured to ensure representation from surgeons performing knee and hip procedures, with additional qualification around shoulder, hip, and knee surgery activity in ASC settings. This structure enabled meaningful spine surgeon ASC usage and behavior research, and physician assistant role in ASC orthopedic surgery study insights.

Participants were screened to confirm that they spent at least 30 hours per week in direct patient care and actively operated or assisted in a Medicare-certified ASC. Spine surgeons were required to conduct qualifying spinal procedures in an ASC each week, while total joint surgeons were required to conduct a minimum volume of relevant joint procedures in the ASC setting. These criteria strengthened the study as a reliable clinical research US healthcare initiative and a source of high-quality ASC healthcare insights.

Results

The study delivered a robust US sample of ASC-experienced orthopedic professionals, providing the organization with a focused view of clinician attitudes, procedure behaviors, and care-setting differences across ambulatory surgery centers and hospitals. These findings contributed to ASC orthopedic research, ASC vs hospital study, and healthcare market research focused on evolving orthopedic care delivery.

By segmenting responses across total joint surgeons, spine surgeons, and physician assistants, the research enabled a more detailed understanding of how different members of the orthopedic surgical team evaluate products, workflows, and procedural needs within ASC environments.

By segmenting responses across total joint surgeons, spine surgeons, and physician assistants, the research provided a clearer view of how each clinical role evaluates products, workflows, and procedural needs within ASC settings. These findings generated orthopedic surgical workflow insights ASC environment and helped clarify surgeon attitudes toward ASC orthopedic procedures across the orthopedic surgical team.

The findings helped inform strategic thinking around biosurgery and wound closure opportunities in orthopedic ASC settings, supporting better alignment between product positioning, clinical needs, and real-world surgical practice. The study also generated wound closure research and biosurgery market insights to guide orthopedic ASC product strategy and market engagement.

For healthcare organizations looking to understand clinician behavior in evolving care settings, our targeted research approach helps generate reliable insights from specialized surgical audiences across high-priority procedure areas. Contact us to get started.